The Carterization of W
| Record high gas prices, talk of a gas shortage, and a foreign policy that is incompetently executed. All that is missing is double digit interest rates and runaway inflation. But substitute that for the administration's inability to rescue the citizens trapped in New Orleans. Let's see, do we have busses? Helicopters? Food and water? Well, not fast enough to save the poor SOBs who didn't get out of The Big Easy on time. Hurricane Katrina was coming, we all saw it coming on Sunday. Its Friday and there are still people stuck at the Superdome? Still people stuck on their rooftops? How many will have died because the help isn't getting there? This was only a hurricane! What if we had been attacked by terrorists? After 9/11, we endured the Patriot Act and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security. Many of us went along with the president on Iraq. He said the WMD were there. Colin Powell went to the UN and said they were there, too. Then none were found -- and granted, Saddam was playing cat and mouse with the weapons inspectors, and everyone thought he was hiding something. But this post isn't about the incompetence of the Bush administration in executing the invasion and occupation of Iraq. It is about the Bush administration's incompetence in general, and now, in particular, in the handling of the storm damage in New Orleans, Biloxi, and along the Gulf coast. Once again, the government is caught with its pants down. The government is ready if a terrorist wants to try bringing box-cutters on a plane again. But for anything else, forget it. I keep thinking, why aren't we flying every helicopter we can get our hands on down to New Orleans to (1) drop food and water, and then (2) rescue these poor bastards??? Then I think of Carter's legendary helicopter rescue attempt of the Iranian hostages. Bush would find a way to screw this pooch too. For me, it is settled. Bush is the new Carter. Except without the warmth or integrity. Jimmy had Billy, George has Neil. Jimmy had his peanut farm, George has the ranch. Jimmy would never tell a lie, George can barely talk. And now George is telling us to conserve gas! How soon before we have 55mph speed limit forced upon us again? Or some similarly drastic measure? |


Comments on "The Carterization of W"
-
aliasgrace said ... (11:52 PM, September 02, 2005) :
-
aliasgrace said ... (11:53 PM, September 02, 2005) :
-
Audient said ... (3:13 PM, September 04, 2005) :
-
Kate Anne said ... (3:19 PM, September 04, 2005) :
-
Christie said ... (8:39 AM, September 06, 2005) :
-
Kate Anne said ... (12:34 PM, September 06, 2005) :
-
Christie said ... (1:41 PM, September 06, 2005) :
-
Audient said ... (1:56 PM, September 06, 2005) :
-
Kate Anne said ... (4:40 PM, September 06, 2005) :
post a commentGer some, Audient! Well said, my dear!
And by "ger some" I meant "get some", which is not as funny the second time around.
Did you see Kanye West on the Hurriace Katrina relief special?
AG ... no, I missed that. And re-reading what I wrote here about Bush, I was much too easy on the incompetent prick.
Well said, pretty much, except the point about Saddam playing cat and mouse with inspectors. No, he actually fully cooperated (which really must have p-ssed Bush off because he was aching for a real excuse to invade).
As for the Carterization of W -- do you think we can get George to build some houses for the poor people homeless, thanks to Katrina -- or will Dubya's Habitat for [Wealthy] Humanity be the building of high rises and other ritzy digs on the spots where the destroyed lower class housing was?
Finally, something to file, for when "they" try to blame the LA governor and the NO mayor, cited at warandpiece.com:
Broken contract. From the Department of Homeland Security:
"In the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or other large-scale emergency, the Department of Homeland Security will assume primary responsibility on March 1st for ensuring that emergency response professionals are prepared for any situation. This will entail providing a coordinated, comprehensive federal response to any large-scale crisis and mounting a swift and effective recovery effort. The new Department will also prioritize the important issue of citizen preparedness. Educating America's families on how best to prepare their homes for a disaster and tips for citizens on how to respond in a crisis will be given special attention at DHS."
Yeah, it would have been nice, too, if they would have given these cash-strapped people transportation money or busses to leave town prior to the hurricane. But God forbid we waste money on poor people who might vote Democratic if given the opportunity to exercise their right to vote.
I visited the original site and perhaps I should shift-apple-3-pdf it before it disappears (like the original exit poll results back in Nov. 2004).
Argh!
I agree with the incompetence. Everyone can say I told you so, but I don't think that W is totally to blame for the fiasco in New Orleans. This was a failure on all levels. The people were told to get out and some refused, the local and state governments failed, and the national government was too slow to respond. It was a complete failure.
I don't think we can put the blame on one individual or group. No one did anything right in this situation.
Don't know if Christie will check back but as to "some refused" -- LOOK who "refused": those who didn't have money at the end of the month to afford gas for the car or a bus or train ticket. Greyhound and Amtrak stopped on Saturday before Katrina hit and those tickets add up when you are transporting a whole family of minimum wage and low wage workers (and welfare recipients). I wonder how many would have refused free tickets or a ride out of town on a fleet-load of busses which FEMA should have sent in, except that that such effort was privatized to Republic campaign donor IEM, Inc. -- the truth is coming out (have fun googling).
Yes, but if my family was in danger, I would have walked as far as I could to get away. Walking is free. I have said the same thing that the tragedy is that many people did not have the means that others had to get out. But, like I said, I would have walked if I had to. Again, I think many are to blame. I also heard recently that people are still refusing to leave even though they have been told they have to. I understand the pride people have in their homes etc, but it is not safe to be there. Yet, they still refuse to leave. For some, I think they COUDLN'T get out, and for some, I think they WOULDN'T.
I would expect that a small percentage of the people that stayed, and were too poor and without means to leave, or hesitant to leave now. They know nothing else, and having been on the dole for so long, probably have no sense of self-reliance. This is part of a much larger problem, poverty and its causes.
Please check out the open letter to the President at the New Orleans Times-Picayune site, Open Letter and other heart-wrenching info at their main page, http://www.nola.com
Also, Thom Hartmann contrasts the differences with response to 2004's Hurricane Charley in Florida at CommonDreams.org's site, "You Can't Govern if You Don't Believe in Government." His show today (9/6/05)(streamable continuously until noon tomorrow at WhiteRoseSociety.org or I will mail you the mp3 if it is no longer available) is a nother real eye opener.
As for walking with a family of little kids or Grandma in a wheel chair when a hurricane is approaching at 120 miles or so an hour, I wouldn't do it. And afterwards, take them through all that water??? No, I don't think so....